A comparison of the ending of Back to the Future Part 1 and the beginning of Back to the Future Part 2.
Duration : 0:2:19
[youtube gvTTT-YX3iQ]
-
Archives
- May 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
-
Meta
I never noticed it …
I never noticed it was 2 different chics… and i thought i was a real fan…lmao
i knew the chick …
i knew the chick look different..but gosh they sure did a good job!!! their professionalism is great…love back to the future!! wooohoo
Worales, que …
Worales, que diferencias, ya decia yo que si tienen sus diferencias.
Simple answer — …
Simple answer — Claudia Wells didn’t return for the 2nd movie. They had to reshoot the same scene with Elisabeth Shue as Jennifer (hence the ability to reuse certain Doc Brown footage not including her).
why did they shoot …
why did they shoot the whole thing again instead of just recycling the footage???
You should be proud …
You should be proud of this much needed research. We all thank you.
amazing continuity …
amazing continuity considering those two scenes were shot four years apart. Must’ve been interesting to prep for the actors too.
1.21Gigowatts?!?!? …
1.21Gigowatts?!?!? what the is a gigowatt?
wtf? i never notice …
wtf? i never notice that before, i was think i was a real fan, it
But which is which?
But which is which?
A Flying DeLorean ? …
A Flying DeLorean ?!?
wow I never noticed …
wow I never noticed there were differences.
I love the trilogy …
I love the trilogy
stereo version
stereo version
Actually, that’s …
Actually, that’s not quite true. The 2nd and 3rd were both filmed at the same time and then released in the same year cycle, 1989 and 1990.
Actually it was 2 …
Actually it was 2 and 3 they filmed back to back. Interesting to see the comparison.
I always thought …
I always thought they filmed version one and two back to back… (?)
I liked the first …
I liked the first jennfer better.
1:46 is where it’s …
1:46 is where it’s at.
Great idea, …
Great idea, excellent execution. Thanks for your comparison videos! Interesting to see the many unnoticed details that were changed rom the original.
Doc 1: Roads?
* …
Doc 1: Roads?
*right after* Doc 2: Roads?
Both Docs (same time): Where we’re going we don’t need…
Doc 1: Roads.
Doc 2: Roads.
XD they were in sync then not and then they were and not… so on.
I liked the pause …
I liked the pause by Doc after Marty asks whether they “become holes or something”; it makes the bit funnier.
Thanks for this. …
Thanks for this. The most interesting part for me is that I’ve never seen the version of part II where Marty says ‘a holes’ before. I figured it must exist, but it’s always been ‘jerks’ in any copy I’ve owned.
Ugh. You’re right. …
Ugh. You’re right. I guess I’m not as big a BTTF fan as I thought. I saw it in the theater in July ’85 and I guess all the years of watching the home video version has blurred the memory of the ending. I honestly had no idea that it was added for the VHS release. Do your worst…I deserve it.
Um. No. The “TO BE …
Um. No. The “TO BE CONTINUED” you’re refering to wasn’t in the theatrical release, they added it to the home video version when they decided sequels would be made, which is why they removed it for the DVD release. I thought everybody knew that.