Aren’t there things like economic facts?
Can’t we look at history and determine a course of action on social issues and methods for proper government interaction within a country?
Hasn’t everything been tried?
I would love to argue issues and facts, not Obama vs. Bush. Why do I care about that anyway as an issue of itself, compared against arguing structure and facts of issues going forward?
Politics are very complicated, there is much deception, and bias, in the politicians and the media.
Economic facts are always revised months later, opinion is offered as fact.
Top leading economists and analysts, are always reported as being shocked or surprised at the latest figures.
The Bush recession is bad with 5.8% unemployment and positive GDP.
The obama recession is good with 10.5 % unemployment and negative GDP.
Politics are very complicated, there is much deception, and bias, in the politicians and the media.
Economic facts are always revised months later, opinion is offered as fact.
Top leading economists and analysts, are always reported as being shocked or surprised at the latest figures.
The Bush recession is bad with 5.8% unemployment and positive GDP.
The obama recession is good with 10.5 % unemployment and negative GDP.
References :
The economic fact that seems to escape those in government is that the more the government takes the less I am going to spend and/or save. housing, food, auto and utilities are fairly non-negotiable, and are not spent as a percentage of income, they are more or less fixed cost items for a given family or individual. Discretionary spending, when you can afford it, is what drives an economy. If the government takes more of our money, less can flow into the economy via discretionary spending.
References :
No, they don’t satisfy me at all. The economic facts are distorted by both sides. I’m voting for the neither party, whaterver it may be. Anything is better than what we have now, we need Change.
References :